Much of marketing today is all about using new technologies to drive better decisions, more effective campaigns and more efficient customer support. Technology is becoming critical for marketers to remaining competitive.
Yet new technologies rise up every day and cut across many areas of the marketing supply chain such as content, media, analytics, CRM, marketing automation, social media, reporting, etc.
So how does a marketer decide which technologies to test and use to grow their business?
A colleague of mine suggested this excellent question for my blog recently and I had no idea how to answer her. So I asked some of the best marketing minds I know to tell us how they approach all the new technologies in the marketing landscape.
The key takeaways from these 5 experts highlighted below: have a solid process, clear goals, a culture of testing and innovation and listen to customer needs.
Cheryl Burgess is the Managing Partner at Blue Focus Marketing. Cheryl has written about this in the Quest For The Marketing Technologist, so she was the first person I thought of to ask.
First, you need to create a business process for reviewing new technologies. This may include establishing a small team of marketing/technologists who understand both the marketplace needs from a customer perspective and, of course, technology. To keep this process less than a full-time team endeavor, you must establish specific criteria to help the team determine (quickly) if the new technology has potential to be adopted and in what time frame. For example, a hot opportunity gets more time and attention from the team compared to a technology viewed to be of a lesser (back burner) opportunity. To avoid pitfalls, the firm must develop actionable criteria, used systematically for each new technological assessment.
The goal is to determine the technology with the highest expected value to the firm. Specific criteria become the basis for determining the course of action, e.g., leading to a trial or pilot. For example:
1) Provider’s brand reputation, 2) potential market impact, 3) interoperability across our technological platforms, 4) implementation cost, 5) cost savings, 6) time savings and other expected business benefits, 7) handle internally or outsource, 8 ) business risk assessment, 9) meets overall business needs, 10) ease of use/simplicity
Current example of Google+. An immediate technology review was warranted because of Google’s brand power. It didn’t matter if previous social media ventures (Google Buzz and Wave) resulted in failure.
Scott Brinker is President & CTO of ion interactive, a company that delivers post-click marketing software and services. He is also the author the Chief Marketing Technologist blog where Scott demonstrates his leadership in this area.
I believe there is value in both a top-down and a bottom-up approach to managing marketing’s technology landscape.
The top-down approach is to focus on the business needs — start with the strategic objectives of marketing, the differentiators of the brand, and the desired customer-centric capabilities — and then do a targeted evaluation of technologies that are “known” tools or components for the implementation of those business needs.
The bottom-up approach is to maintain awareness of new marketing technologies being released — TechCrunch, ReadWriteWeb, AdAge are great sources for these announcements — without examining them too deeply or thinking too hard about how to immediately apply them.
The bottom-up approach feeds ideas and new options into the top-down approach.
Of course, I’d advocate that a technically-savvy individual in marketing take the lead in managing the department’s technology landscape — the role of a chief marketing technologist, a marketing CTO.
Steve Woods is co-founder and CTO of Marketing Automation provider Eloqua. Steve is also the author of the book the Digital Body Language, the Digital Body Language Blog and the user-community blog Eloqua Artisan.
In the past decade, we’ve transitioned from an environment in which marketers were able to define what messages they sent out, and over what channels, to an environment in which buyers are exclusively in control of what information they discover. This means that the decision of which channels to participate in is one of understanding how buyers discover information, and where they are when they discover it.
Buyers generally discover information in three ways; actively, passively, or through influencers. Active discovery is where buyers directly seek a piece of information – as they would in a search on Google. Passive discovery is where buyers stumble across a piece of information that they were not directly looking for, as they would with great content or an advertisement that caught their attention. Influenced discovery is where buyers receive information through the people whom they trust in their social graph.
Marketers today need to think of their communication options in terms of how buyers discover information, and from that, where they need to be in order to be discovered during a buying process.
To determine which of the many new marketing outlets to use in a business, marketers need to follow a three step process; first map out the set of questions, from earliest stages of awareness through to close, that a buyer goes through. Then, for each question, determine how a person is likely to discover this information – actively, passively, or through influencers. Finally, map each question to its most likely place of discovery, and ensure you are found there. This might lead to better content and search engine optimization if you notice that buyers are actively discovering information on your products via search, or it might lead to more social media engagement if you find that buyers are being educated via influencers on how to think about a particular market space.
Jonathan Becher is EVP and acting CMO at my employer SAP. Jonathan writes the Manage By Walking Around Blog and is a former CEO of three software firms. I asked Jonathan to help answer this question because he knows Marketing Technology from both a leadership and a marketing perspective.
I think these tools have an analogy with transportation. There are many modes of transportation: walking, bicycles, motorbikes, automobiles, buses, trains, planes, etc. Each is better suited to different transportation needs depending on the distance I have to travel, the time I have to get to my destination, the amount of money I have to spend, the environment between point A and B, the number of other people likely travelling at the same time, and other factors. Based on these imprecise factors, I choose a mode of transportation. Within a mode of transportation (perhaps automobiles), there are also choices of consumption (purchase, rent, timeshare, borrow) and choice of types (SUVs, sedans, convertibles).
Each consumer likely chooses a primary mode, consumption, and type that suits them for most of their needs. When the primary doesn’t work, they then go to an alternate. When evaluating the investment for the primary, they can either try to become an expert by doing lots of research (think buying a car) or go to a trusted expert (friend, professional service).
The exact same thing holds true in this space. Five years ago I did research to figure out what service to use for my personal blog. I was still confused and asked a expert. Now, people ask me. In evaluating whether I should switch from Twitter to Google+, I’m doing my own research but Dennis Howlett’s recent public decision to drop twitter will impact me greatly.
Mike Volpe is CMO at inbound marketing software company Hubspot. Mike blogs at Marketing With Mike and also on the Hubspot Blog. Mike answered the main question and graciously added two excellent follow-ups:
How does a marketer decide which technologies will produce the best business outcomes?
You can’t know for sure in advance. The key is to test and experiment. At HubSpot, we do agile marketing for that reason – it provides for a lot more flexibility and ability to experiment. We’re constantly testing new things and seeing if they work (like Twitter back in 2007) or don’t (like Google Buzz back in 2010). Stop trying to guess what will work, and start building a culture and structure that embraces experiments.
How many “point solutions” do we really need?
Marketers have always tried to cobble together a bunch of different tools because no one gave them a single platform to manage everything in one place. I think that is a huge problem, and that is one of the core 2 problems with marketing that we solve at HubSpot.
What do we outsource?
You should outsource tactics, not strategy. The strategy of what you do needs to come from the people that have the most to win or lose with the business itself, and who live and breathe your culture. No outside firm will ever have the same incentives or cultural experience as an employee. However, once the strategy is set, there is nothing wrong with getting someone on the outside to do the work to execute on it.
Well I cannot thank these amazing marketing leaders enough for their perspective on this tough question.
But now it’s your turn. Tell us what approach you take to decide which new tools and technologies in the marketing landscape can help grow your business.
“Marketing Tools and Technology – How Does A Marketer Decide?” was originally posted on Michael Brenner’s Blog

Please add ckburgess and mnburgess to your Google+ Circles…
Just click the circles! Or click links: gplus.to/ckburgess and gplus.to/mnburgess

Please add ckburgess and mnburgess to your Google+ Circles…
Just click the circles! Or click links: gplus.to/ckburgess and gplus.to/mnburgess
























{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }
A company is really only the people in it … and with that comes the limitation of people, humans. As humans we only have so much time, only so much mind space. The question is how do we allocate this mind space.
If I may make an analogy. My ex-wife and I had a disagreement on our daughter, Alex’s – education focus. Mitra, my ex, wanted Alex to get perfect grades (at the expense of spreading herself too thin). I wanted Alex to strive to go beyond just getting an A … but take her preferred craft (writing) to level that only she could achieve with focus. Since Alex grew up with me … I won and Alex writes as well as anyone I know (way better me).
As a business, social media and technology – and the plethora of it’s options, seem all too tantalizing, but we can only digest so much. Fortunately, or unfortunately we’re not all technology experts. Oh, by the way Alex, my daughter works for Apple and I sure can’t keep up her.
Clay,
Thanks for your comment and sharing a positive, personal story.
Indeed, it is all about deciding on what is important and where to focus. We can’t manage it all so having an ability to prioritize and “pick” what is most important is key. Much easier said than done.
By the way, love Apple products!
Cheers!
Cheryl
When I started my remote recruiting company, in 1991, there was no internet, no email, no web. I would transfer Filemaker databases to my recruiter in San Francisco every night, back and forth through Timbuck Two. It would take all night – ten hours (assuming we didn’t loose a connection). That technology, in today’s world was primitive …. but at the time we were on the bleeding edge. Being able to work at home, living where you wanted – with no restrictions, and most of all – no commute (especially in Los Angeles where Alex and I lived) … was not just economically correct, but mandatory.
When I started as single father, Alex was 13 months old. By time she was three, I started my own firm. Because of my parenting duties, and my recruiting focus being nationwide – I had to find a technology solution that would accomplish that. That was my first and foremost focus.
With the options available today … why don’t we think this way. Why don’t use business technology as a way to not only increase business productivity … but personal productivity. Why don’t we use it further our relationship – especially with our families. We complain about schools … but we can fill in gap at home – assuming we’re at home.
Never before have we had the opportunities we have now … but we don’t take advantage of them. We still automatically get in our cars and drive to work, when can accomplish the same work from home. Yet we don’t do it.
When we make technology decisions – we need to look at structural business decision. How can we help our employees, our team’s lives better. If their lives are better, then they will be more productive and more likely to stay employees. Which in turn will make our companies more profitable.
Technology is multi-facited. It’s benefits can extend past what it’s original intent was. It’s just up to us to expand our minds enough what to see what the real possibilities are.
Clay,
There are genuine benefits for allowing employees to work from home such as keeping cars off the road (less pollution), helping a company make a serious contribution to the environment. Working remotely should become the norm. With new technologies, it’s not only possible to work from home, it’s possible to work from anywhere in the world – and that’s the real life-changer.
Your comments give this subject even greater relevance, because choosing the right technology for a business is multifaceted; it needs to be custom tailored to individuals as well. I’m truly a technology addict, but aware there is no comfort zone. We need to be technologically savvy to adapt.
Hopefully, positive use of technology will make us happier.
Thanks for your thoughts. I’ve been thinking about what you said all day. It’s always a pleasure to engage with you.
Cheers!
Cheryl Burgess August 12, 2011 – Update to my REPLY….Just came across this great infographic today in Mashable “The Rise of The Mobile Workforce”.
I had no idea when I woke up this morning – where it would go. You hijacked my brain … I’m been on this pent up writing street – in other words haven’t written anything in a month. I don’t want call it writers block … because it’s not.
Bono said “I found not what I’m looking for.” The name of my blog is “The Road to Your Perfect World.” It’s not about the destination, it’s about the journey. We will never find it. But that doesn’t mean we can”t try -we can’t give up hope.
The “Perfect World” is journey, it’s a journey that you take … however far away. This journey can be business. This journey can also be personal. With that lies the …
Today marketers find themselves at the crossroads of content, context, creative execution and technology. Consumers control the conversation, marketers initiate it. Because technology is critical to where, how.and when this dialogue is happening, marketers need to have a digital strategist as well as a creative technologist on their team. Silos are 20 th century thinking. Collaboration is the new black. The risk of not adopting this approach can be catastrophic: mistaking app development when platforms are required or failing to grasp the importance of agile development.
Michael,
Great thoughts! I truly appreciate your taking the time to comment on Michael Brenner’s great blog.
We are now in a new era of collaboration, as you said, “Collaboration is the New Black” and synchronization between marketing and IT. As such, moving toward agile intelligent marketing requires a delicate balance of risk, innovation and learning.
For CIO’s and CMO’s the next frontier of success, innovation and opportunity is through closer alignment, collaboration and strategic partnership.
Thank You & have a great weekend!
Cheryl
Michael,
Great article and so refreshing to hear someone say strategy first, then tools. In July eMarketer released a study that “found 78% of executives thought a social business strategy was somewhat or very important to the future success of their business” yet only 17% felt their social media strategy was “ahead of the curve.”
I loved the transportation analogy and wanted to share mine. As Cheryl knows, I ran the Army Strong marketing campaign. I took over this multi-million dollar campaign with little to no marketing experience. What I did have was years of experience as a strategic and tactical planner. I modified the planning process we used in the Army to fit our marketing work. My analogy is marketing tools are my arsenal. We could do carpet bombing (TV) or use more direct fire systems (print, etc). However, its hard to win hearts and minds by just dropping bombs! Based on the intelligence (research) we had in 2007 I began looking for the marketing equivalent of special forces, and that was social media. Just like a special forces team, social media can be used to observe your target audience or it can be used to engage the target audience. In the military we use a targeting process Decide – Detect – Deliver – Assess that I have found works very well in social media.
No matter the analogy you use, it is important to remember that no one jumps on a bus without knowing where they are going or starts dropping bombs without having objectives in mind. That’s strategy.
David,
Thank you for your great comments on Michael’s post.
As I shared with you earlier this week, so much of marketing parallels military strategy. When we talk about creating successful campaigns, attacking the competition, and using advertising for air cover, they all have roots in military strategy. Also, I didn’t realize until we ‘chatted’ that you also admire Al Ries. Always enjoy sharing insights and strategies with you.
BTW – Really “LIKE” your blog “Thoughts Over Coffee – One Cup at a Time.”
Also, in addition to your blog comments, it was a pleasant surprise to receive your “Google+ Invite” today. Thank you! I didn’t realize you were on Google+ until I saw your invite. Did you read my recent Google+ blog? “Is it a Digital Disruption for CMOs?”
If you check now, I just added you to my Google+ circles as well. It’s great that we share so many friends. I look forward to engaging with you IRL, Twitter and Google+.
Cheers!
Cheryl
Clay, Michael and David: thanks to you all for the comments. And tahnks again Cheryl for re-posting and moderating these wonderful comments.
@Clay: I really appreciate that you took the whole challenge and expanded the scope beyond “marketing” through your insightful stories and perspective.
@David: Great analogy to the battlefield. And defining where we are going and why anyone should care (strategy) is the first step in the process. Thanks so muchy for the insightful comments!
@Michael: “Collaboration is the new black” is such an amazing quote. And I agree with you that this is just as important and should be mentioned along with the counter-trend of content strategy. Because together they encompass the what and the how for businesses to deliver customer value.
Clay,
We need to live our lives, love the journey and enjoy the people we encounter, either in real life or on Twitter. Any journey is incomplete without friends guiding and supporting us. We cannot compare our lives to anyone else because we have no idea what their journey is all about. Life is a journey where the destination is unknown. A journey without the love of our family and friends would not be worthwhile.
While we may not be perfect we seek perfection in love. Once you have found that perfection never let it go.
I don’t usually hijacked too many people’s brain, but if I did yours I hope it was worth the journey
Have a great weekend!
Regards,
Cheryl
{ 2 trackbacks }